Causes of Lovelock and Loveluck Deaths |
These days if we want to know the Causes of Death we have only to read the Death Certificates
for the individuals concerned, but certificates were only introduced in England and Wales when
the system of Civil Registration of Births, Marriages and Deaths was created in mid-1837. Before
that we must rely on the diligence of individual clergymen responsible for administering at a
funeral when it came to them making an appropriate entry in their Burial Registers.
However, there was no requirement in church or civil law for the cause of death to be recorded,
and so there are many entries in many Burial Registers that give us no clue as to the cause of
that individual’s demise.
We can also never be sure with deaths before 1837 whether a doctor had been present at the
death, and therefore able to make a specific judgment of the cause. With the majority of the
England and Wales Lovelock and Loveluck community being engaged in agricultural pursuits there
would have been precious little, if any, spare money to pay a doctor's fees. Instead there would
have been a reliance on folk remedies for all sorts of ailments. Any infliction that, in today's
medical opinions, would require surgery was either somehow done without or considered with a
good deal of apprehension, perhaps even fear, in the days before scrupulous cleanliness,
disinfection and totally effective anaesthetics. Just consider the possible consequences of the actions of the 16th Century country surgeon pictured here! |
|
![]() |
Naturally many Lovelock or Loveluck deaths, in common with the rest of the population, will
have been due to the degradations of advancing years, several of the causes of which were
generally understood and their symptoms easily recognised. As a for instance we have the case of
Elizabeth Lovelock from the Wootton Rivers Tree who died on 18 September 1872; whoever Certified
the death gave as the cause 'Old Age Dropsy', a condition which would have been plainly evident
(Dropsy being the retention of fluid in the body's tissues). Often, though, the person reporting
the death and the Registrar seem to have colluded in arriving at a vaguer form of words which
satisfied the need to complete a Certificate. A case in point is that of James Lovelock who died
on 27 August 1858 at the age of 88: Cause of Death is recorded as 'Decay of Nature Certified’,
although by whom certified is not stated.
There would also have been Lovelocks and Lovelucks amongst the legions of those who succumbed to
the commoner killers – Smallpox, Tuberculosis, Typhoid and Cholera amongst them – but whose
burial details omit any such mention.
So far as our accumulated data is concerned we know of only three Lovelocks who were felled by
Smallpox, and one other who might have been. The ‘might have been’ was Robert Lovelock who, when
buried at St James’s in Clerkenwell on 19 July 1760, was ‘of the Smallpox hospital’. He may of
course have been a member of staff who died from something other than Smallpox. The definite
cases we know of were Ann Lovelock who was buried on 9 Jun 1779 in Basingstoke in Hampshire,
Sarah Lovelock who, at the age of only 13 months, was buried at St Anne’s in Soho, London on 27
October 1802, and George Lovelock from the Kintbury Tree who died on 2 May 1868 in Lambeth,
Surrey.
The incumbent at St Anne’s around the time Sarah died was one of those diligent clergymen
mentioned above who through his Register also provides us with the following:
Amey Lovelock aged 5 died of a Fever and was buried on 16 September
1802
David Lovelock aged 4 died of 'Decline' and was buried on 20 October
1802
Elizabeth Lovelock aged 50 died of a Fracture and was buried on 10
November 1805
Thomas Lovelock aged 50 died of 'Decline' and was buried on 24
November 1805
Richard Lovelock aged 2 died of Watery H and was buried on 1 September
1808
Amey and David were from Star Court, as was Sarah, so it seems likely that they were siblings,
bringing real tragedy to their parents. Thomas and Elizabeth were both from St Giles, so may
have been husband and wife. But what are we to make of the term ‘Decline’ since the two
examples given are of very different ages? Dying of a fever or a fracture both suggest there
were other complications, and Richard may have been the victim of Cholera, a not uncommon
disease in areas with poor sanitation, of which London had many.
Perhaps one of that incumbent’s successors was responsible for recording that Elizabeth
Lovelock aged 34 died of a Miscarriage and was buried at St Anne’s on 7 May 1843.
![]() |
|
The Smallpox cases mentioned above are certainly not the only Lovelocks or Lovelucks to have contracted the disease, but fortunately many of them will have survived. The disease is now considered to have been eradicated, but as late as 1921 one Arthur Lovelock was a patient in the Clare Hall Smallpox Hospital in South Mimms, Middlesex. Arthur recovered, married in 1931 and died only in 1986. Such hospitals were established throughout the country to isolate the patients, and the establishment pictured on the left, in Hampstead, was one of them. Details of the Hampstead hospital’s history are available here. |
Smallpox was of course the first disease for which vaccination was introduced in the United
Kingdom. Some key points regarding the history of smallpox vaccination in England are:
The Find my Past Web Site has some records of vaccinations in the Southwark district of London, probably all for smallpox, and amongst them are a number of Lovelock entries. There are no Loveluck entries.
In innumerable early cases the actual cause of death would have been beyond the capabilities
of the contemporary medical science to determine. One such case amongst our data is that of
Fanny Lovelock who was buried at Little Bedwyn in Wiltshire on 3 November 1838. Fanny was
unfortunate enough to have been married on 9 May 1826 to
James Lovelock who was
transported to Australia in 1835. The incumbent at Little Bedwyn found it necessary to
mention this in his Burial entry, which may be considered rather unkind, but he also included
a Marginal Note to the effect that an inquest had been held into Fanny’s death, and the verdict
delivered was ‘Died by the visitation of God’. This was an expression often used whenever the
actual cause of death was not identifiable and death was sudden and unexpected, probably
covering many deaths due to strokes, heart attacks or, less commonly, afflictions such as
brain tumours and internal haemorrhages. Had it occurred earlier the sudden unaccompanied death
of Police Constable John Lovelock in 1873 might well have been judged as due to a visitation, but
as it was the Coroner decided that death was caused by an epileptic fit.
One of our data collections that includes Cause of Death for a significant proportion of the
entries is that of the Jamaican Lovelocks
. With only one exception the deaths occurred in the 20th Century and reflect the
advancement in diagnostic capabilities that had been a feature of 19th Century medicine.
Briefly discussed elsewhere on the Web Site is the matter of Infant Deaths – those aged 0 to 10.
There were a whole raft of diseases, infections and conditions that might be responsible for an
infant death, particularly before the 20th Century. Indeed in 1880 infant deaths accounted for
68% of all the Lovelock deaths occurring in England and Wales. One who succumbed to a disease
we associate very much with childhood was Sarah Lovelock who died on 29 April 1844 at the age of
only 2 years and 10 months of what the Registrar has recorded as ‘Hooping Cough’. But there was
another Lovelock infant who must have suffered unimaginably before dying at the age of only 4
months. This was Louise Irene Lovelock from the Wiltshire-Cornwall Tree whose death the
inquest jury decided was caused by 'natural causes due to exhaustion', but they were censorious
of both parents in light of the neglect which a doctor's examination of Louise had revealed.
He found the child extremely emaciated with very little flesh upon her bones and no food in her
intestines. 'Natural causes' can of course cover a multitude of reasons, some very unusual, and
whilst that was the official verdict in the case of Rose Lovelock who died aged 2 in July 1888
the doctor who attended her had no doubt that the actual cause was 'sudden spasm of the glottis,
while teething'.
One disease that was very common in childhood until the 1950s in the UK was Measles. In very much earlier centuries this was often confused with smallpox and not differentiated from it until the 10th Century by a Persian physician known as Rhazes at a hospital in Baghdad. It is generally accepted that the disease was widespread in Europe in the Middle Ages, and certainly epidemics were reported in England and Scotland as late as 1670 and 1674. Considered medical opinion seems to be that it was endemic in Great Britain and Europe throughout the 18th Century, and apparently even increased in frequency of occurrence in the 19th and early 20th Centuries. In 1905 a school in Carshalton in Surrey, for which a Mr Lovelock had some sort of visiting responsibilities, closed from 9 June to 3 July 'because of the measles epidemic' as reported in the School Log Book. There must have been many Lovelocks and Lovelucks amongst measles victims, but no mention of it as the cause of death of a Lovelock or Loveluck seems to exist. Whilst it still kills upwards of 100,000 people per year in developing countries it became, thanks to vaccinations, comparatively uncommon in the UK. However, in 2023, there were no less than 1,603 suspected cases reported in England and Wales (3 of which resulted in a death), which apparently indicated a significant rise compared to previous years. Even worse, there were 2,911 laboratory-confirmed measles cases reported in England in 2024, very nearly an 82% increase compared to the 2023 figure, and the highest number of cases recorded annually since 2012. Up to 28 April there have been 320 laboratory-confirmed cases reported in 2025, almost 62% of them in children aged up to 10. |
|
![]() |
Sometimes the cause of death has nothing to do with disease or infection, but is the result of an accident and is often an event associated with various degrees of violence. A few events from our data store will serve to illustrate this point. On 27 September 1658 John Lovelock of Purton in Wiltshire was making his way to Weyhill Fair when he fell from his horse and was killed. Then in 1787 William Lovelock, a lad only 5 years old, was found drowned in a pit in Hankerton Common in Wiltshire. A more recent circumstance was that involving William Clifford Lovelock from the Cholderton Tree who on 27 August 1925 was struck and killed by lightning in Saskatchewan in Canada. Yet another William died in a most unpleasant way, partly at least due to his own actions. He and a Joseph Rogers were working in a field together in the summer of 1838. William, a member of the Compton Tree, apparently mocked his colleague for some reason and so provoked him that Joseph threw a pitchfork at William which stuck in his temple; William, who was only 15 years old, died a few days later. An unpleasant and untimely end was also visited upon Hannah, the wife of a William Henry Lovelock. An inquest on her in August 1893 heard that she had probably fallen whilst carrying a burning paraffin lamp upstairs, and the resultant conflagration had resulted in her body being badly burned all over; she died from shock the next day. A most unfortunate death was the fate of Gwilym Loveluck. He slipped on a piece of orange-peel in the street, receiving an injury from which, despite an operation being performed, he died. Equally unlucky was Eliza Winifred Lovelock (nee Briant) who, in March 1907, ran 6 oak splinters into a thumb whilst scrubbing a sill and died of general blood poisoning 17 days later. Another apparently innocuous accident befell Sarah Lillian Lovelock who fell out of bed and despite being taken to hospital died of a Subdural Haemorrhage. A decidedly untimely death was visited upon Neville Lovelock - he was at a birthday party on the pleasure boat Marchioness on the River Thames on 20 August 1989 when it was hit twice by the dredger Bowbelle and sank with the loss of 51 lives. Neville's was not the first Lovelock life to be claimed by the Thames - Monica Katherine Lovelock died when her husband's motor-cycle combination plunged into the river in 1958. And of course we must not forget the manner of departure of a Lovelock whose name at the peak of his fame was on everybody's lips - the athlete Jack Lovelock. As a result of being thrown from a horse in 1940 he apparently suffered from dizziness attacks, and when one of these came upon him one day in 1949 he fell from a New York Subway platform into the path of an oncoming train.
There must have been many occasions when a Coroner's or Inquest Jury's verdict was considered by some to be less than satisfactory, as might be considered to be the case in the inquest upon the death of a Catherine Lovelock at the age of 30 in 1835. She was apparently found in the New River in Islington, Middlesex. But after six hours of deliberation the jury could only provide a verdict stating 'That the deceased was found drowned; but how she came into the water there was no evidence to show.'.
Extreme violence of one form or another has resulted in the deaths of not a few Lovelocks, but fewer Lovelucks - we think particularly of those who died in one war or another - but there are other innocents upon whom the worst of deaths have been inflicted. One such was Daniel Lovelock from the Lyneham Line whose fate is related on our 'Other Matters' page.
Death at the hand of the enemy was not always the fate awaiting some of those who served. We have a small collection of burials of Lovelocks in India, mostly of serving soldiers around 1900. Amongst them are Walter Richard Lovelock who died of Dysentery, a George Lovelock who died of Tubercle of the Lung, a John Lovelock who succumbed to Enteric Fever, another name for Typhoid, and George Lovelock from the Beckenham Tree who most unfortunately developed an Abcess of the Liver. An earlier casualty in India was Alfred Lovelock, possibly of the St Pancras (Main) Tree, who died of Cholera during the Indian Mutiny.
Murder has always involved the authorities in one way or another, but even accidental deaths will still attract their attentions. Such a case was the death in 1869 of Harriet Lovelock. In due course her daughter-in-law, Mary Anne Lovelock, appeared at the Gloucestershire Assizes accused of the manslaughter of Harriet. At the end of the case, 'which lasted all morning' according to a newspaper report, the jury acquitted Mary Anne without hesitation. Evidence given by a surgeon indicated that Harriet's heart was 'much diseased', but that in fact she had died from a broken jaw, which the defence suggested was caused by a fall. The jury, at least, did not believe Mary Anne had inflicted that injury.
In some cases death was very much a release from a troubled state. We think particularly of those who suffered one form or another of mental illness - illnesses which seldom actually caused death but which inflicted major distress upon those afflicted and those about them, especially in times when effective treatments just were not available. Although the infamous Bethlem Hospital in London had existed from medieval times it only really became an institution specialising in housing those with mental problems following its rebuilding in 1676. Elsewhere sufferers were cared for by their families or sometimes by the local community. The first County Asylums were built in 1808, but many were not constructed until well into the nineteenth century. One such was the Wiltshire establishment at Roundway near Devizes, opened in 1851, but in common with many others the county had other institutions - including at Fisherton Anger the 'House of Mr Charles Finch, Licensed for the reception of insane persons'. The Wiltshire Family History Society has indexed its registers, and the results are presented on the Find my Past Web Site. The registers include details of 9 Lovelocks, which are presented here.
One category of deaths that often arises out of desperation or mental distress, is that of suicide. There have unfortunately been several cases of Lovelocks falling into this category, but out of respect for those concerned we need not name any of them here. It may come as a surprise to some to realise that in England and Wales suicide was a criminal offence until the passing of the Suicide Act 1961. Before that those who survived a suicide attempt could be prosecuted and imprisoned, and even the families of those who died could potentially be prosecuted as accesories.
Finally, death has come to many as a result of the due processes of law. The British Executions Web Site which claims to provide details of most criminal executions carried out in Britain between 1100 and 1964 has no references to Lovelucks and just one to a Lovelock. The unfortunate was John Lovelock who was hanged on Gallows Hill, Winchester in Hampshire for breaking into the dwelling house of Robert Mayhew and stealing therefrom £50 (worth some £8250 in 2025). He was hanged on 1 July 1759.